TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo
The reading states that a professionally painted Jane Austen portrait, as a teenage girl, which is owned by a member of the Austen family has come up for sale and there are reasonable evident that she is the subject. The lecturer, however, casts serious doubts on this claim by representing some counter-arguments and examples. She believes that none of these evident are convincing enough and there are still many questions remained unanswered.
To begin with, although the reading declares that the Austen family members have accepted the claim that the girl in the portrait is Jane Austen, the lecturer makes the argument that this claim cannot be true because she had been dead almost 70 years ago and none of the family members that approved the validity of this portrait could have lived on those days to see her actual face.
Second, the article asserts that the face of the portrait vividly resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch. Besides, the passage claims that the features of the sketch are still identical to those of the portrait. Meanwhile, the lecturer refutes this claim and believes that this portrait may have related to some of Austen's cousins or the teenage children in their family.
Third, in contrast to the reading positing that the style of the painting is related to Ozias Humphrey, a society portrait painter who was recruited by Austen family and also the active years of the Humphrey is exactly coincide with the age of the girl in the painting, the lecturer thinks differently and insists that there is an evident which reveals a different result. He believes that according to the canvas of this painting, it could not be related to Austen because she was probably 27 on the day these kinds of canvases were sold.
- TPO 21 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
- TPO 15- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-15 - Independent Writing Task.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 3
- TPO 10- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'evidents'?
Suggestion: evidents
...me up for sale and there are reasonable evident that she is the subject. The lecturer, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'coincided'.
Suggestion: coincided
...active years of the Humphrey is exactly coincide with the age of the girl in the paintin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, second, so, still, third, while, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91582491582 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51719927997 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521885521886 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.92748819 49.2860985944 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.222222222 110.228320801 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 21.698381199 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470190763701 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187303753004 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136649665972 0.0662205650399 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289821867393 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251204319738 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.3589403974 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.