The reading and the speaker discuss selling fossils for private owners from different perspectives. The speaker negates all the ideas has mentioned in the article. He says that the advantages of commercial fossils greatly outweigh it disadvantages.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that people suffer a lot because private collectors do not allow them to view their collections. This point is challenged by the speaker. He restates the fact that since the private owners hunt the fossils for trade, they bring people many chances to see the fossils. Moreover, they tend to show their collections in public school or library routinely.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that scientists lose the access to some significant evidence. Therefore, they miss important potential to discover the extinction of life forms. The speaker rebuts this idea by saying that before the commercial trade the fossils, the fossils need to be examined and evaluated by scientists first. Therefore, scientists do not lose any chance to detect the life forms from the fossils.
Finally, the author of the reading states that private fossils collectors ruin the valuable scientific evidence with the fossils they excavate because they are untrained and uninterested in document that disclose about animal life in the past. The speaker, on the other hand, opposes this point by saying that is it better to have some unearth fossils than completely keep them in undiscovered.
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 63
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 70
- 79.Is the ability to write and read more important today than in the past? Why or why not? Use specific reasons to support your answer. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27004219409 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68985273426 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565400843882 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0128977448 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0769230769 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400344506693 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126927000779 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872070971139 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245916489992 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538853809246 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.