TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him

The reading and speaker discuss the issue of Robert E. Peary to the North Pole from different perspectives. The author of the reading points out that indeed Peary reaches the North Pole. However, the speaker casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He says that none of those ideas that the author of the reading has mentioned are unconvincing.
First of all, the author of the reading says that the National Geography Society proves that through the investigation of Peary's record concludes that he reaches the North Pole. This point is challenged by the speaker. He restates the fact that the committee is not objective because this organization refunds to the trip of Peary. Moreover, the report of the committee is not careful. Therefore, the idea that the author of the reading has cited is bias.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that a recent expedition provides support for Peary's claim that he reached the North Pole in 37 days, and Tom Avery also made the same trek to the North Pole in less than 37 days. The speaker rebuts this claim by saying that the trip of Tom Avery is different from Peary. Moreover, Tom Avery traveled to the North Pole in a suitable weather. Meanwhile, the time when Peary claim to reach the North Pole is not appropriate.
Finally, the author of the reading states that the photographs, which are taken by Peary with the Sun's position in the sky shows that he took those pictures in the North Pole. The speaker, on the other hand, opposes this point by saying that Peary used the camera that could not focus in subjects. Therefore, those his pictures were not precise. Moreover, those picture were taken about 100 years ago. They are probably fade and blurred. As a result, they are not accurate.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'faded'.
Suggestion: faded
... about 100 years ago. They are probably fade and blurred. As a result, they are not ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75490196078 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37653610859 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457516339869 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6739331412 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.75 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441353821386 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133203152033 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144179401608 0.0662205650399 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293757589935 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121631363091 0.0443174109184 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.