TPO 16
The lecture and the reading passage discuss possible reasons that cause reduction of covering and studying old cultural artefacts in The United Kingdom. Although the passage claims that scientists have several hypothesise that explain this phenomenon, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the reading points out that many artefacts are destroyed by construction. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that before starting to construction, the place must be check and examine by archaeologists. After it, this place may attribute, interest or value for them. In this situation, archaeologist and local government must get to getter for excavating or extract valuable things. Then, the government may allow to the people for construction in this place.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that the government does not support archaeologist in the aspect of financial; however, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that any archaeologist pay by company not government. Therefore, there would be a good financial aid for archaeologists' projects.
Finally, although the reading passage says that archaeologists do not have suitable and permanent jobs; hence, most people do not study archaeology at university, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that this rule has made a great deal of paid jobs available for archaeologists. He also adds that archaeologists can check, analyze and publish their reports with the support that is provided for them form the construction companies due to that rules.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, so, then, therefore, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72727272727 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10358914092 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603305785124 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0343837857 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188824724835 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075284010081 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367088208628 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111691884055 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413468859011 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.