TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t

The author of the reading passage talks about the serious consequences of constructing buildings and limitations faced by the archaeologists to preserve the important old artifacts in Britain in twentieth century. He mainly stresses on three major problems but the speaker refutes the points mentioned in the passage for the following reasons.

First, author states that the due to the new construction in cities, builders destroyed many valuable artifacts. In contrast, lecturer says that according to the new guidelines of the government the construction site has to be examined by the expert archaeologist to look for if it is archaeologically important and for any precious artifacts. Therefore, now it is not possible for any builder to cause damage to these sites and to precious artifacts.

Second, the passage tells that there is no sufficient funding for investigating all important projects. On the contrary, the speaker explains that as per the new guidelines the construction company has to pay for all the expenses that includes the site examination, to preserve the precious artifacts if any. Hence, now financial independence is provided to the archaeologists to explore and preserve all significant sites.

Third, the reading mentions that there are not enough jobs archeological field that compels many good archaeologist to choose a different career. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts this idea and suggests that as the construction company has to pay, so, many archaeologists are being hired by these companies.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sts are being hired by these companies.
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'as to', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24427480916 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.145038167939 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.114503816794 0.0723426182421 158% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0343511450382 0.0435111971325 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0114503816794 0.0277247811725 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12213740458 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0343511450382 0.0370669169778 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.20868775099 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0534351145038 0.0208969081088 256% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.148854961832 0.128158765124 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00763358778626 0.0114777025283 67% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1546.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 240.0 271.125827815 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.44166666667 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.408333333333 0.374372842146 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.35 0.287516216867 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.270833333333 0.187439937562 144% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.179166666667 0.113142543107 158% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20868775099 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 51.6842052847 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7292029233 49.3711431718 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.6 132.220823453 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 0.878197800319 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 59.0 50.5018328374 117% => OK
Elegance: 2.1 1.90840788429 110% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.643820698212 0.549887131256 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163436374915 0.142949733639 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0771979322797 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.701112079855 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129383643525 0.139662658121 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.335298609014 0.266732575781 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134724823035 0.103435571967 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.459301370998 0.414875509568 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0753431506034 0.0530846634433 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.472669327365 0.40443939384 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836652000941 0.0528353158467 158% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.