The article states that the science of archaeology faced serious problems and limitations in Britain and provides three reasons of support. Conversely, the professor states that new rules and guidelines that have been adopted in 1990 improved the field of archaeology and improved the situation. And she refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading avers that construction projects lost many valuable artifacts. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that according to the law of 1990, any construction site should be examined by archaeologists before the building begin. So, if the site is valuable, posses precious artifacts found there, the builder company, with the local government should work together to preserve this an artifact site. This could be done by either building around the site, or excavating the site properly. The professor concludes this new law in Uk have had ensure the archaeologically valuable sites would not been lost to construction anymore.
Second, the reading claims that many archaeologist felt that financial support for their research was inadequate, since only the government support them. The professor, on the other hand, refutes this point by stating that by the law in 1990, all financial expenses for archaeology research should be paid by construction companies and not by the government. For example, fees of the initial examination for a site paid by the company. If the site have valuable artifacts, the company would pay all the work of archaeologist in order to do their project. As a result, The professor adds, this new income source would have make a wide range of further studies for archaeologists available.
Third, the reading posits that archaeology jobs difficult to be found. The professor disagrees with this point by explaining that the new law that legislated creates more jobs for archaeology fields that have not existed in the past. The professor provides an example of the excavation process for a site. It would start from examination, do research on to a site, then preserve artifacts if they were found, and finally processing the data into the system. All these steps increase the numbers of archaeologists in the UK that could not have been able to find jobs before.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 73
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 68
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aying that according to the law of 1990, any construction site should be examined...
^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'ensured'.
Suggestion: ensured
...r concludes this new law in Uk have had ensure the archaeologically valuable sites wou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'ensured'.
Suggestion: ensured
...r concludes this new law in Uk have had ensure the archaeologically valuable sites wou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 365.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24109589041 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89685576372 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501369863014 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3284117874 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.277777778 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2777777778 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299684341884 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100349038939 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566690403991 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183886375608 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463714675556 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.