The reading and lecture both discuss the effect of increase the human settlement on the birds populations. While the reading provides three reasons to support the negative effect of the increase of human populations on the bird's habitats, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that the increase of human growth will be the cause of disappear of many wetland. So, many birds will decrease. On the other hand, the speaker argues this notion by saying that increasing the urban area will affect some birds but not all the species. For example, foxs and hocks will find new city to live in. As a result, their populations will increase in future. So, increasing the human populations will cause increasing for some populations and shrinking for others.
In addition, the article avers that increasing the human population's needs increasing in agricultural area. So, the bird habitats will d in the future. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this point by saying that increasing the agriculture in the future is a true story, but the United States use less and less land every year for agriculture. Moreover, introduction of new crops will add new food for birds. So, it is a good opportunity for bird populations to grow.
Finally, the reading shows that increasing the population will need increasing in agriculture. Consequently, more pesticides will be used. So, many birds will die due to contaminated water and food. However, the professor questions this idea by pointing out this is incorrect point. This is because people in future will be more aware of using the pesticides. For instance, first of all, new much less toxic pesticides will be in the market. Second, people will grow pesticides resistant crops which are less attractive to insects. So, pesticides will not affect the bird's growth in the future.
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 70
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 60
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wetland seems to be countable; consider using: 'many wetlands'.
Suggestion: many wetlands
...rowth will be the cause of disappear of many wetland. So, many birds will decrease. On the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...result, their populations will increase in future. So, increasing the human populations w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 568, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...cts. So, pesticides will not affect the birds growth in the future.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14983713355 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78587905946 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478827361564 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8861131761 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2857142857 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.619047619 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4968694098 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185006795034 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860706070115 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317749754018 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862734002207 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.