The reading passage contends that the number of birds in the United States will declined due to the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the idea in the reading passage that natural habitats of birds will continue to decrease as human populations and settlements continue to expand. This is attributed to the fact that it is true that in urban place, birds’ natural habitat has been disappeared. However, while specific species are decreasing in their population, some species are increasing in their populations, such as hawk. Many people have claimed that there are many hawks which makes them disturb. Thus, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer casts doubt on the idea in the reading passage that as human population is growing, agricultural activities also increase. This is because even bird habitats have destructed in the past for agricultural use, wilderness areas would be no longer converted to agricultural use because of new developed crop. Using this crop, people are not necessary to destruct the bird habitats. Consequently, the reading passage’s second point is refuted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the idea in the reading passage that the use of chemical pesticides will be increased to keep pace with expanding human settlements and increasing agriculture. It is obvious that it is true chemical pesticides result in declines in bird population. However, there are two solutions to solve this problem. First, scientists have developed new type of pesticides which would not contaminated water. Second, people’s thinking against traditional pesticides resistance will increase and they are trying to not use chemical pesticides. As a result, the reading passage’s final point is contradicted.
- 41. A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent. Another study, howe 83
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decline'
Suggestion: decline
...mber of birds in the United States will declined due to the steady growth of the human p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 496, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pesticides'' or 'pesticide's'?
Suggestion: pesticides'; pesticide's
...ple's thinking against traditional pesticides resistance will increase and they are t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268156424581 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.164804469274 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103351955307 0.0723426182421 143% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0418994413408 0.0435111971325 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0195530726257 0.0277247811725 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106145251397 0.128828473217 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0530726256983 0.0370669169778 143% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01916479959 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0251396648045 0.0208969081088 120% => OK
Particles: 0.00279329608939 0.00154638098197 181% => OK
Determiners: 0.0865921787709 0.128158765124 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0167597765363 0.0158828679856 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00837988826816 0.0114777025283 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1982.0 1645.83664459 120% => OK
No of words: 305.0 271.125827815 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.49836065574 6.08160592843 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.374372842146 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.344262295082 0.287516216867 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.262295081967 0.187439937562 140% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.173770491803 0.113142543107 154% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01916479959 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 53.5301080866 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9411764706 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6593207811 49.3711431718 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.588235294 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.941176470588 0.878197800319 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 52.3674059788 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.88888888889 1.90840788429 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.653510274593 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0971098613597 0.142949733639 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0701513817434 0.0787303798458 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.483154635677 0.631733273073 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167229835576 0.139662658121 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235174857994 0.266732575781 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173275879853 0.103435571967 168% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.406642318227 0.414875509568 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00715329818607 0.0530846634433 13% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.487947559789 0.40443939384 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567438115217 0.0528353158467 107% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.