In the given set of materials, the main topic has centered on remedies for preserving Torreya from extinction. While the author has proposed three main solutions for its survival, the speaker in the follow-up material cast doubt on those points by providing justifications and examples.
The first point mentioned in the article is that Flourishing Torreya in its current microclimate which was defined as a suitable climate for its growth could be beneficial. As it indicated, it was cooler and wetter than surrounding ambient. However, the lecturer stated that due to global warming and dehydration of wetland in Florida, it microclimate would not be suitable for its survival.
Moreover, according to the essay, relocation Torreya to a place with cooler weather was regarded as a great strategy to hinder its extinction. Nevertheless, this was questioned by the speaker as she referred another example. Based on empirical observation, this strategy had posed threat on the plants and caused them ruin.
Last but not least, the writer has suggested this species could bring to research center as it paved the way for better flourishing condition and preservation. Conversely, according to the professor, this remedy had destructive consequence on Torreya due to lack of its genetic variation and scarcity.
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 80
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 86
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 76
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258771929825 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.162280701754 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0789473684211 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.030701754386 0.0435111971325 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0526315789474 0.0277247811725 190% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135964912281 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0701754385965 0.0370669169778 189% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.01282722874 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030701754386 0.0208969081088 147% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.100877192982 0.128158765124 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0131578947368 0.0158828679856 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00438596491228 0.0114777025283 38% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1315.0 1645.83664459 80% => OK
No of words: 206.0 271.125827815 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.38349514563 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04852973271 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.422330097087 0.374372842146 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.334951456311 0.287516216867 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.257281553398 0.187439937562 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.179611650485 0.113142543107 159% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01282722874 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616504854369 0.539623497131 114% => OK
Word variations: 61.3123682696 53.8517498576 114% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2437580833 49.3711431718 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 132.220823453 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 0.878197800319 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 54.0951456311 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.89285714286 1.90840788429 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.580594729414 0.549887131256 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103118141005 0.142949733639 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0456344594034 0.0787303798458 58% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.625974076638 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13092576403 0.139662658121 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240659040759 0.266732575781 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10138294063 0.103435571967 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.253574180036 0.414875509568 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0515787441033 0.0530846634433 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366113971852 0.40443939384 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713087645986 0.0528353158467 135% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.