The reading passage gives an overview of advantages and positive consequences of Genetically Modified Foods (GM). These are developed in laboratories using molecular biology techniques. It provides resistance to cold, drought, pests, produce higher yields, etc. Also, GM foods reduce need for toxic pesticides and man-made fertilizers. More importantly, GM foods promise to meet higher demand of food using the best techniques. The lecture focuses on the negative impacts on three major fields.
The professor makes the first point by stating negative impacts on environment. She claims that although GM foods provide resistance to various defects and increase crop production, it introduces urbsides weeds in the area surrounded by GM crops. These weeds are impossible to eradicate. Also, pollins of these plants has higher mortality rates in butterflies. When theses pollins are blown nearby, they destroy butterfly population.The professor in the lecture makes the second point by stating adverse effects on human health. GM foods cause new allergance. Due to that new allergic reaction take place in human body. These reaction may carry serious risks. A lot of laboratory work is needed to tackle this problem.
Finally, the professor states that GM foods spend a lot of money to demand. Moreover, small income farmers cannot afford these GM plants or foods. In short, around one third of farmers cannot afford these techniques. In this way, GM foods extend or widen gap between rich and poor.
In general, the professor in the lecture induces risks which are bounded with GM foods. She states adverse influences of these foods on Environment, health of human and economy. In sum, the professor casts doubt on the points stated in the reading text.
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard ho 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A person s childhood years the time from birth to twelve years of age are the most important years of a person s life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it, or is it better to save for some time in the future? 70
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement."Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs 42
- Pets should be treated like family members. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...arby, they destroy butterfly population.The professor in the lecture makes the seco...
^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this reaction' or 'These reactions'?
Suggestion: This reaction; These reactions
...rgic reaction take place in human body. These reaction may carry serious risks. A lot of labor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun laboratory seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of laboratories'.
Suggestion: A lot of laboratories
...These reaction may carry serious risks. A lot of laboratory work is needed to tackle this problem. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... or widen gap between rich and poor. In general, the professor in the lecture i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, in general, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3309352518 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69223398001 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593525179856 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8726568784 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.3636363636 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6363636364 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0465004468634 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0157732053062 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0143183454313 0.0662205650399 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0304375469998 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00783221354437 0.0443174109184 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.