According to the reading passage, in 1988 forest fire in Yellowstone has negative impact on plants, animals and local economy. Whereas, according to the lecture, the speaker provides positive effect on plant and wild life after forest fire in Yellowstone in the United States. He contradicts each point made in the article.
First, the lecturer argues the first point made in the reading passage that, fire caused extensively harm to the trees and smaller plant were burn completely. Also, less than half land had been scorched. He mentions that scorched area help to colonize new plants and diverse them. Before the fire, small plants cannot grow because of shed by the large tree but after the fire, small plant chance to grow under light. Some seeds are not germinated without higher heat but this seeds were germinated after fire.
Second, the lecturer also refutes the second point made by the article that under fire large animal flee and smaller animal not escaped. In fact, devastated habitats and destroyed food chain after impossible to wild life survived in this area. He explains that animals had new opportunities to habitats in this area because of growing of small plants eat by the ideal animal such as rabbits and hairs. These animals had predators so, food chain become stronger.
Third, the article emphasizes that fire caused decrease the tourist attraction and negative effect on local economy. The lecturer, in contrast, implies that if, the forest fire took place every year then, decrease the visitor but it is not happened. It is rare things that low rainfall, storms, and stronger winds caused by fire but it is not possible every year. So, visitor comeback next year after forest fire and not largely impact on economy.
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 80
- People should not buy the foreign products instead they should purchase the products of their own country Agree or disagree 83
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 73
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 73
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ely harm to the trees and smaller plant were burn completely. Also, less than half l...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ire and not largely impact on economy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, third, whereas, in contrast, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02749140893 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29296417823 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53264604811 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5154077069 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4375 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323545081082 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106297819277 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536647290837 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191999172235 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334346447776 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.