The article states that, Environmental factors to effect on many frog species were decline in number or even die out and provide the three methods for protecting the frog. However, the professor is explains that this method is not work as practically and refutes each of the author’s method.
First, the reading claims that farmer use the pesticide which is harmful to the frog because pesticide have chemical when frog contact with this pesticide it is effect on the nervous system and also respiratory system. So, reduce pesticide use in farm. The professor refutes this point by saying that, without uses of the pesticide then crops losses and decrease the crops yield. Pesticide use for protect the crops from the harmful bacteria so pesticide is essential.
Second, the article posits that, anti fungal medicine and treatment use for the infected frog. However, the professor say that fungal treatment is too costly when use for each frog and also problem is catch the each frog to the treatment. This is problem not solve easily because the offspring of the frog also get the same problem so large scale is expensive and complicated.
Third, the reading says that population decline by the excessive use the lakes and marshes water human it is effect on the frogs. The professor opposes this point by explaining that decline the water level in lakes and marshes due to the global warming.
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 85
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 73
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 81
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 90
- People should not have to pay for public transportations. 60
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.297297297297 0.261695866417 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.138996138996 0.158904122519 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0694980694981 0.0723426182421 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0617760617761 0.0435111971325 142% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00772200772201 0.0277247811725 28% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.11583011583 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.015444015444 0.0370669169778 42% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.44451696579 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.015444015444 0.0208969081088 74% => OK
Particles: 0.003861003861 0.00154638098197 250% => OK
Determiners: 0.146718146718 0.128158765124 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.011583011583 0.0114777025283 101% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1401.0 1645.83664459 85% => OK
No of words: 235.0 271.125827815 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96170212766 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370212765957 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276595744681 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.148936170213 0.187439937562 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110638297872 0.113142543107 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44451696579 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502127659574 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.9433200003 53.8517498576 85% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 21.3636363636 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7514716504 49.3711431718 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.363636364 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.878197800319 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 49.0232108317 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 2.05555555556 1.90840788429 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466541408574 0.549887131256 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.203498165623 0.142949733639 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.111062817924 0.0787303798458 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.706050234448 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14644368609 0.139662658121 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249760110857 0.266732575781 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836869664753 0.103435571967 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.41613291276 0.414875509568 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0301576884431 0.0530846634433 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352298095907 0.40443939384 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297174377528 0.0528353158467 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.