The lecture and the reading both discuss natural forest fire. The reading states that in the united stead was a policy which called let to burn. According to the reading, this policy permits to burn forest without any significant damage. However, this policy causes many problems in Yellowstone and fire expand in the vast areas. The lecture refutes this, saying that actually firing plants are an ecological cycle and burning policy are fundamentally good one.
First of all, the reading claims that vegetation and many trees have damaged by the fire in Yellowstone and by burning trees especially small trees are create lots of smokes in the Yellowstone. However, the lecture argues that the plant of the Yellowstone became more diverse because the fire creates opportunity for the plant which could not grow. For instant, seeds by very high feed start appearing as well.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that many animals in the forest run away such as deer and some small animal could not able to escape. Moreover, the food supplies completely destroy. The lecture counters this point by stating its similar story with the animals and not the population recover but also the fire create lots of opportunity in the Yellowstone. For example, some species such as rabbits to start surviving that depends on predator's food.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that forests are very important for the tourist and by firing forest, it leads to decline the number of tourists. Moreover, local people have a job that related to the parks. The lecture refutes this claims by pointing out that firing forest would be a problem for a tourist if it happens every year and it is a combination of some important factor such as low rainfall or dryness.
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 86
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 80
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 86
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'burning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'permit' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: burning
...ing to the reading, this policy permits to burn forest without any significant damage. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'predators'' or 'predator's'?
Suggestion: predators'; predator's
...bits to start surviving that depends on predators food. Lastly, the reading passage argu...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260869565217 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.139751552795 0.158904122519 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0931677018634 0.0723426182421 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0621118012422 0.0435111971325 143% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0124223602484 0.0277247811725 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124223602484 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0341614906832 0.0370669169778 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43406354191 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0217391304348 0.0208969081088 104% => OK
Particles: 0.00310559006211 0.00154638098197 201% => OK
Determiners: 0.145962732919 0.128158765124 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00931677018634 0.0158828679856 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00931677018634 0.0114777025283 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1753.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 295.0 271.125827815 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94237288136 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383050847458 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274576271186 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.132203389831 0.187439937562 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0847457627119 0.113142543107 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43406354191 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535593220339 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 54.5921867934 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6666666667 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1271272754 49.3711431718 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.866666667 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 47.1242937853 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.95652173913 1.90840788429 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.662464646709 0.549887131256 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0917076581962 0.142949733639 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0665808640289 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.560343697038 0.631733273073 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163985191858 0.139662658121 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.292620891885 0.266732575781 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135062050762 0.103435571967 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.433498304598 0.414875509568 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0679705649865 0.0530846634433 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.492975448294 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426043658795 0.0528353158467 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.