tpo 21
In the reading material, the author raises three strong arguments to support his claim that planting genetically modified trees on a large scale promises to bring a number of benefits. The lecturer, however, disputes those reasons one by one and finds them not convincing at all. She adds this kind of tree is not beneficial.
Initially, the article states that genetically modified trees are designed to be harder than nature trees; that it, they are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. The professor refutes this point by saying that it is part survival of trees play a key role and non modify trees genetically diverse and at some harsh situations like climate or pests genetically modified trees wipe out albeit other trees might be survived or some of them survived.
Secondly, the article posits that genetically modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them. The lecturer, yet, declares that the cost of modifying is high and farmers should pay more money for genetically modified trees in comparison to other trees so the farmers could not invest and save on pesticides as well.
Thirdly, through the author's lens, the use of genetically modified trees could prevent overexploitation of wild trees. The professor debunks this idea by explaining that genetically modified trees could damage local wild trees on the ground that they grow aggressively and among other trees so this kind of trees use water and another mineral which is vital for other trees growth then wild trees suppose to destroy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...sticides as well. Thirdly, through the authors lens, the use of genetically modified t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08527131783 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6214734539 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562015503876 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.8050092799 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.777777778 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.589789644123 0.272083759551 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.273809384478 0.0996497079465 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119204079131 0.0662205650399 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383081163543 0.162205337803 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916670442704 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.