TPO 22
The main idea of both the lecture and the passage is about whether ethanol is a proper replacement for gasoline or not. Considering this, the author claims that ethanol cannot be an appropriate alternative for gasoline. The professor, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the way that the reading just argued. The professor demonstrates three reasons to reject the points in the passage.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that ethanol do not do anything has to do with the problem of greenhouse gas, due to the fact that it releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when it burns for fuel. As stated by the professor, the ethanol will not increase global warming. It is true that it releases carbon dioxide when it burns, but this issue compensates with the process of growing plants, such as corn, which are used in order to produce ethanol. Because, these plants absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere so as to grow.
Moreover, unlike the passage which claims that using ethanol reduces the major source of food for animals. The professor illustrates that in order to produce ethanol, the plant's cell walls, which name eludes me at the moment, are used, which is not eaten by animals. So, employing ethanol as an alternative for gasoline will not reduce animals' food sources.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the passage that the price of ethanol cannot compete with that of gasoline, saying that one the use of ethanol increases, the produce of it will be increase, which leads to decrease the price of ethanol. It is presumed that after using ethanol as an alternative for gasoline, the cost of producing one unit of ethanol will be diminished by 45%.
All in all, the professor maintains that none of the options in the reading is not convincing, and ethanol is an appropriate alternative for gasoline.
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 73
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 70
- tpo 32. Are people less happy than they were in the past? 76
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 80
- TPO 31 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s to reject the points in the passage. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 2, column 558, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...sorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere so as to grow. Moreover, unlike the passage whi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
...s that in order to produce ethanol, the plants cell walls, which name eludes me at the...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'moreover', 'so', 'as to', 'such as', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254054054054 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.156756756757 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0378378378378 0.0723426182421 52% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0486486486486 0.0435111971325 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0216216216216 0.0277247811725 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.159459459459 0.128828473217 124% => OK
Participles: 0.0378378378378 0.0370669169778 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5822805106 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0216216216216 0.0208969081088 103% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.135135135135 0.128158765124 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0162162162162 0.0158828679856 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0216216216216 0.0114777025283 188% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1951.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 330.0 271.125827815 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91212121212 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369696969697 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.293939393939 0.287516216867 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160606060606 0.187439937562 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106060606061 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5822805106 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487878787879 0.539623497131 90% => OK
Word variations: 49.7012256518 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5714285714 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6299728344 49.3711431718 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.357142857 132.220823453 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.878197800319 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 52.9653679654 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.9880952381 1.90840788429 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.737643910932 0.549887131256 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.148519024577 0.142949733639 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.084829217303 0.0787303798458 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.680446295392 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172155170158 0.139662658121 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.38097353465 0.266732575781 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107214183694 0.103435571967 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.449047201491 0.414875509568 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.037365432897 0.0530846634433 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.552787136301 0.40443939384 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631736660008 0.0528353158467 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.