tpo 22
Top 22
The reading passage discussion is about the disadvantages of the replacement ethanol fuel with gasoline in the United States and provides three reasons to prove its claim. However, the professor thinks none of them is convincing, and this replacement does not have the mentioned disadvantages.
First, the text tells that the ethanol like gasoline is harmful to the environment and causes the global warming by producing carbon dioxide. However, the professor explains that this pretension is not valid. According to the passage, the ethanol is produced by plants which absorb the carbon dioxide. Apparently, the plants remove the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This beneficial point makes the ethanol good choice for alternative fuel because ethanol is not dangerous for the environment like gasoline.
Second, the author states that the creation of the ethanol can be decreased the amount of the animal's food. In contrast, the professor says that the producer can change the type of the plant for producing the ethanol. In fact, they can produce ethanol from selenium which is not eaten more like corn with the animals. Hence, it is impossible to annihilate this problem.
Third, the passage asserts that the cost of the ethanol will be much more than the gasoline if the government eliminates its helping for keeping the ethanol price like the gasoline. On the contrast, the professor refutes this reasons because with increasing usage of the ethanol its cost will be declining and be of the gasoline price. So, the government must not keep its price low.
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 73
- tpo 33When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 65
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities? 66
- tpo 24 73
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Top 22 The reading passage discussion is about ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s not have the mentioned disadvantages. First, the text tells that the ethanol l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rous for the environment like gasoline. Second, the author states that the creat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...anol can be decreased the amount of the animals food. In contrast, the professor says ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oduce ethanol from selenium which is not eaten more like corn with the animals. H...
^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... impossible to annihilate this problem. Third, the passage asserts that the cost...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...government must not keep its price low.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1640625 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6383588649 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49609375 0.540411800872 92% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5867661729 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4285714286 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482046520309 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157969367384 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999361413411 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280721067869 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505562610961 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.