Students are influenced more by their teachers than by their friends.
Originally, some people think most of the students try to be like their teachers and they have an individual experience that can defend from their claim, but I think students are more influenced by their friends because of some reasons that I will mention.
Firstly, the majority of the students trust to their friend's opinion because they are in the same age. Students are at a very sensitive age. They always try to find a person who comprehends them. As we know, the perspective of the people in the same age is relatively same since students think that their friends' idea or activities are completely true and they try to be like them. On the other hand, there are teachers who are older than them.In fact, the gap generation creates the lack of similarity between them that does not let them accept their view of life or any other activities. So, the same age can have an effect on students view about their friends.
Another reason that can prove this claim is teachers' manner. Teachers characteristic between children are a person who wants to order them since the students try to flee. A very bad issue that common in the society is the teacher's role. All of the students look at to their teachers like a boss, not friend, and this mentality becomes an ordinary issue that prevents the students from liking their teachers or wanting to accept their advice. It is another reason that draws off students from the teachers. Also, some teachers do not try to absorb students. As I said before, because teachers are older than the students, each advice from them like an order and the student think that they want to make them does that work. The student can not recognize their kindness. This is another reason that prevents students from teachers.
In conclusion, the lack of similarity that results from the gap generation makes a lot of problems that does not let them have a pleasant relationship with each other and direct students to imitate from their friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 60 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-04 | Yam Kumar Oli | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | rahmi88 | 60 | view |
- Tpo 9. Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.I completely disagree with this claim that nowadays children are less creative than they were in the past. Here you can see my reasons. 73
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 73
- tpo 7 3
- It is more important to keep old friends than It is to make new friends. 60
- tpo 33When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...re are teachers who are older than them.In fact, the gap generation creates the la...
^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...issue that common in the society is the teachers role. All of the students look at to th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...on in the society is the teachers role. All of the students look at to their teachers like...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, i think, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75290697674 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41046925307 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433139534884 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2173436362 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1764705882 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427751831437 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142481668799 0.076458572812 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105212623579 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274476140388 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839062662342 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.