TPO 22- Ethanol replacement vs. gasoline
The lecturer and the passage discusse replacing ethanol over gasoline. Although the passage claims that this replacing is not beneficial due to increase the carbon dioxide, reducing animals food and providing high cost for government, the speaker refutes this idea through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the ethanol whould not a helpful replacement due to the reason that it releases carnon dioxide as well as gasoline which is provide greenhouse gas as well. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that it is true that this matter releases carbon dioxide, but this fuel is making by plants. Therefore, for having a great amount of this fuel a large number of plants should be cultivated. As a matter of fact, growing the number of plants is reducing the carbon dioxide.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that by producing ethanol from plants the food of other animals such as corn will be reduced, the speaker argues that this fuel is producing of cellules. The plants having this matter is not eaten by animal; thus, the producing of the ethanol is not declining the food of other species.
Finally, although the passage says that the government should be cost over 11 bilion dollars to keep the price of the ethanol as the same as gasoline, the professor disagrees by mentioning that in the future this fuel could be a strong comptetion over the gasoline due to the fact that by increasing the produce of this fuel its price would be drop. As a result, this fuel bcome more available to use by the people. He also adds that the reaserchers claim that by enhancement the production of this fuel three time greater, its cost would be droping 40 percent than before.
- TPO17-Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are 71
- always telling the truth s the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. 70
- TPO35 In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The "Voynich manuscript," as it becam 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...on dioxide as well as gasoline which is provide greenhouse gas as well. The speaker, in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... for having a great amount of this fuel a large number of plants should be cultivated. As a matte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, so, therefore, thus, well, in contrast, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85526315789 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48874718174 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.076116635 49.2860985944 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.181818182 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06452816374 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102007261436 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482302705884 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565909607823 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070381908009 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161679597192 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.