TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task
Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.
First, the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help tosolve one of the biggest environmental problems caused by gasoline use: global warming. Like gasoline, ethanol releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when it is burned for fuel and carbon dioxide is greenhouse gas: it helps trap heat in the atmosphere. Thus, ethanol offers no environmental advantage over gasoline.
Second, the production of significant amounts of ethanol would dramatically reduce the amount of plants available for uses other fuel. For example, much of the corn now grown in the United States is used to feed farm animals such as cows and chickens. It is estimated that if ethanol were used to satisfy just 10 percent of the fuel needs in the United States, more than 60 percent of the corn currently grown in the united stated would have to be used to produce ethanol. If most of the corn were used to produce ethanol, a substantial source of food for animals would disappear.
Third, ethanol fuel will never be able to compete with gasoline on price. Although the prices of ethanol and gasoline for the consumer are currently about the same, this is only because of the help in the form of tax subsidies given to ethanol producers by the United States government. These tax subsidies have cost the United States government over $11 billion in the past 30 years. If the United States government were to stop helping producers in this way, the price of ethanol would increase greatly.
The reading and the lecture are both about of using Ethanol instead of gasoline for fuel usage. It states that based on the view of some critics, Ethanol its not a good replacement for ethanol for several reasons. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that Ethanol is a good alternative for replacing gasoline for the several counterpoints he made against the article.
First of all, the author points out that global warming is one of the biggest consequences of using gasoline, so ethanol not gonna change this big environmental issue. It is mentioned that Ethanol and gasoline both release carbon dioxide through burning and therefore the carbon dioxide will trap in the atmosphere. The point is challenged by the lecturer. She says the use of Ethanol will not add any carbon dioxide to the global warming. Ethanol will release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, but also it is the source of carbon dioxide usage of some plants like corn. Furthermore, she argues corn is a plant that produces ethanol, so it will counteract the amount of carbon dioxide to be released on the air by consuming this chemical composition that produces by ethanol, and it will do not have any effect on global warming.
Secondly, the author contends that the production of ethanol fuel will reduce a significant amount of plants. The article notes animals like cows and chickens feed on corn, so using corn to produce ethanol leads to a disappear of animal foods. The lecturer rebuts this argument. she suggests cellunone is part of plants that not be eaten by animals. she elaborates on this by mentioning that Cellunone can be used to produce ethanol, and since its a part of plants that not feed the animals, it can use for the production of ethanol.
Finally, the author states that ethanol is an expensive fuel and it cannot compete with the price of gasoline. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that ethanol can be cheaper if it is bought by people. She puts forth the idea that people will increase the demand for producing ethanol, so it leads to more production of this material. As a result, by producing more ethanol, the price will reduce by three times that it is now.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | sandeshbhandari2 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | nusybah | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | S M Naimul Mamun | 71 | view |
- TPO8 Integrated writing 3
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing TaskEthanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoli 71
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ed on the view of some critics, Ethanol its not a good replacement for ethanol for ...
^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... using corn to produce ethanol leads to a disappear of animal foods. The lecturer rebuts th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ods. The lecturer rebuts this argument. she suggests cellunone is part of plants th...
^^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...of plants that not be eaten by animals. she elaborates on this by mentioning that C...
^^^
Line 4, column 445, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...n be used to produce ethanol, and since its a part of plants that not feed the anim...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 382.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78272251309 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53579538145 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447643979058 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1415395125 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1578947368 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.549406644182 0.272083759551 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181609940371 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989048943494 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3537988194 0.162205337803 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122272432881 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.