TPO-24
The reading states that researchers by broking open a Tyrannosaurus rex leg bone find remind of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix. The professor explains that remind evidence of brock bone do not actually result in those things that passage states.
For the first claim, the reading states that there are small branching channels inside of the bond that can be reminded blood vessels of it. The professor opposes this point by saying that bacteria may make that channels.
Second, the passage states that there is the presence of spheres that could be reminded of red blood cells. To prove that, it mentions that there are iron materials and the size of spheres are as big as a blood cell. In contrast, the professor says that holes may be reddish mineral.
As final result reading states that tests on bone show that it contains collagen, but professor explains that collagen cannot lose as much as that, and it may from another source like researchers skin.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
- TPO 35 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 70
- TPO 30 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, may, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 1373.03311258 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 167.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88622754491 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31970823395 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 145.348785872 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 419.366225166 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6498344889 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338088718727 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148243743268 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107405378538 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202300916301 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720985033152 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 63.6247240618 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.