TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently

The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about animals' living tissue in fossils and its applications for researchers. The passage provides three reasons and, on the other hand, the professor rejects whatever mentioned in the passage.
First, the passage and the professor talk about residue of blood vessels. According to the reading, the author states that many small channels have been found inside the leg bone of the fossil. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point and states that after the death of animal, bacteria colonize inside the body of the animal and form a hollow channel. Thus, this channels may not relevant to the living's animal tissue of the discovered fossil.
Second, the passage and the professor discuss the issue of red blood cells. The passage states that, due to microscopic examination, the existence of spheres could be related to red blood cells. On the other hand, the professor is against this idea and states that other animal may also have red blood cells and this red blood cells which passage talks about may come from another origin.
Eventually, the passage and the professor discuss the issue of Collagen. The passage talks about the presence of Collagen inside the fossil; however, the professor rejects this point and states that we know Collagen cannot last for the long time. He adds that Collagen may come from the skin of the researcher who carries the fossil.
All in all, the passage provides three reasons about animals’ living tissue in fossils and its applications for researchers, but the professor thinks none of these is reasonable.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ects whatever mentioned in the passage. First, the passage and the professor tal...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, thus, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06766917293 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46308031863 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462406015038 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7087676847 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260346532691 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108970999432 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501200044026 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146117714813 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651154331623 0.0443174109184 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.