TPO 24
Animal fossils help scientists reveal some knowledge about the ancient T. rex.
The issue both the reading and listening focus on is revelation from animal fossils but the listening disagrees in three main points.
At the first point, it is stated in the reading that there is soft, flexible organic substance found in the T. rex fossils. This substance may be the intact of the actual blood vessels of T. rex. According to the listening, the substance might be something else that is far distinct from the vessels. In fact, after T. rex is dead, one kind of bacteria are likely to dominate the hollow. They tend to produce moisture, which are then misunderstood to be the remaining of T.rex's blood fossil.
At the second point, the reading believes that in the fossil found, scientists are able to find the spheres that could be the remnant of red blood cells. On the contrary, the listening argues that several species also prove to have such spheres though they do not possess red blood. As a result, the spheres found might be purely the remaining of the red mineral.
At the last point, the reading mentions that scientists prove the existence of collagen in the dinosaur leg, which is exactly the substance that is expected to be found in association with bone tissue. However, the listening confirms that collagen will not ever last over 100000 after the animals are dead. Therefore, the collagen founded in such 70000000-year-old fossils prove to be a ridiculous finding. As a matter of fact, the finding may be that of the researchers conducting the excavation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-24 | thanhhsgs30 | 80 | view |
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food producedlocally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard at school. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Getting a job in which you work with other people is better than getting a job in which you work alone. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to give students prizes or awards for their efforts trying than for their achievements successes or grades 90
- With the rapid advancement of communication technology smart phones tablets and other mobile devices some people believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, then, therefore, in fact, kind of, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.859375 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6257439422 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3822763085 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8571428571 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360126591781 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112781938506 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717383200385 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19404269415 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085138748697 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.