tpo 25
The material discusses the concept of the vessel that was discovered in Iraq were ancient electric batteries. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely vessel could not be electric batteries dur to absence of any metal wires. Next, the copper cylinders inside the jars is similar to one used for holding scrolls. Finally, the electricity is useless for ancient people.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is that people who discovered this vessel were not archeologist, they were not trained; so may be there was metal wire, but they did not recognize it or thought it was not interesting. In addition to that, its similarity to the hold scrolls might be an original design; however, later they found that it could produce produce electricity with iron and water. Therefore, it could be designed for one purpose then it adapted to another one. One final point, ancient people could discover that the vessel cause shock, so they could convince others that they had invisible power. Furthermore, they could use this power for healing, such as relaxing muscles and remove pain, which doctors could use it for the same purposes.
In summary, there are discrepancies in the information presented.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n Iraq were ancient electric batteries. While the reading looks at the topic from one...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: produce
...however, later they found that it could produce produce electricity with iron and water. Theref...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...repancies in the information presented.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30493273543 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67687088905 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600896860987 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4897056941 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6363636364 7.06452816374 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341232032785 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12839386723 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08032173755 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170775877516 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10962001563 0.0443174109184 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.