The articles states that it is not likely that the ancient vesseles found in Iraq were used as electric batteries and provides three reasons of support. The professor explains that the statements given it the passage are not convincing and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that if the vessle were used as batteries, there would have been an lelectricity conductior attached to it. The professor refutes this point by saying that since the vessles were found by local people and not by professional archaeologists, it is possible that there were acctually other materials nearby the vessel like, wires and things like that, but since they were not intresting to the local people the did not bother to collect them and they were just throwen away.
Second, the article claims that the copper cylinders inside the jars look exactly like copper cylinders discovered in Seleucia, which were used for holding scrolls of sacred text. However, the professor contends that even though they were simillar, but it does not mean that they were not used as a electrical device. She states that it is known that in ancient times, people used iron, liquid and coppor to creat electrical current. And also, she explains that in those times, sometimes people used some devices other than their original porpuses and adapted them to do something else.
Third, the reading avers that, ancient people did not need electricity, because there were no electircal devices in those times. The professor opposes this point by saying that the electricity which is generated from batteres, makes people to feel shocked or gives them tingling sensation. She states that this might have been intresting to them because, it would have been like magic to them. Furthermore, according to the professor, the electrical shockes, nowadays, are being used to simulate muscles, and for healing purposes. So, the ancient people might have used them for the same reason.
- A foreign visitor has to spend only one day in your country. Where should that visitor go on that day? Why? Use specific reason and details to support your choice. 61
- 73)Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 71
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'state'.
Suggestion: state
The articles states that it is not likely that the ancient ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...sed as batteries, there would have been an lelectricity conductior attached to it....
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...oes not mean that they were not used as a electrical device. She states that it i...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.194986072423 0.261695866417 75% => OK
Verbs: 0.211699164345 0.158904122519 133% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0640668523677 0.0723426182421 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0529247910864 0.0435111971325 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.058495821727 0.0277247811725 211% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128133704735 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0696378830084 0.0370669169778 188% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.44868834508 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0278551532033 0.0208969081088 133% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0974930362117 0.128158765124 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0111420612813 0.0158828679856 70% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00557103064067 0.0114777025283 49% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1968.0 1645.83664459 120% => OK
No of words: 322.0 271.125827815 119% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11180124224 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363354037267 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26397515528 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17701863354 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114906832298 0.113142543107 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44868834508 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518633540373 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 53.6237572339 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.7692307692 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5222514277 49.3711431718 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.384615385 132.220823453 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.878197800319 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 51.1667462972 50.5018328374 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.21551724138 1.90840788429 64% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.69859514941 0.549887131256 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149148473288 0.142949733639 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0553502950801 0.0787303798458 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594136477087 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144003245176 0.139662658121 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.32601268389 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125985990348 0.103435571967 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.435473222301 0.414875509568 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0192612337812 0.0530846634433 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.519878058277 0.40443939384 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318289447321 0.0528353158467 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.