he reading and the lecture discuss the causes of the Ice age which was a period when the temperature was really low in some parts of the world. The author proposes three likely causes for this occurrence. The professor brings into question the claims made in the lecture. He considers that the causes pointed by the author are out-of-date and non of then can account for explaining the Ice age.
First, the author comes up with the idea that the ice age was the result of the disruption of the ocean current. It is mentioned that there was a warm period before the Ice time in which the glaciers melted and the water went down into the Gulf stream-a current which affected the earth’s climate. However, the professor argues that the Gulf stream just affects Europe, North America, some southern parts’ atmosphere, so it could not affect that much in all the world’s climate.
Second, the author states that volcanic eruption caused the ice period because the dark sulfur clouds in the atmosphere could stop sunlight to reach the earth surface, provoking less temperature. The professor rebuts this argument by pointing out that the dust released by volcanic eruption could not be enough to cause such a change in temperature.
Finally, the author contends that the decline of the human population could cause to more trees grow that, as a result, provoked that the greenhouse –earth’s heat keeper- decreased as well. The professor, on the other hand, posits that a change in population could not affect the earth climate in such an amount because it was really quick, and the trees needed to be cut out, as well, for the people who remained.
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 80
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 85
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 85
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 83
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he reading and the lecture discuss the cau...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'reads'.
Suggestion: reads
he reading and the lecture discuss the causes of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...parts' atmosphere, so it could not affect that much in all the world's climate. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, really, second, so, then, well, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91166077739 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53607369124 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554770318021 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3797323746 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.363636364 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365074639456 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139592277598 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696003431137 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212891334802 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446531018759 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.