TPO 28 integrated essay
In the lecture, the professor asserts why the arguments from the reading about Peary's claims that he reached the North Pole are not convincing. The article, the other hand, states that there are three arguments provide strong support for the truth of Peary's claim.
First, although the National Geographic Society declared that Peary's has reached the Pole, they were not objective. This is due to the fact that many of the committee members were friends with Peary and they financed him for his journey, which made them biased. Moreover, they conducted the investigation only for two days and they did not examine Peary's records closely. This opposes the reading, which states that the National Geographic Society put together a committee to conduct a complete investigation of Peary's records and equipment, which resulted in supporting Peary's claim that he had reached the North Pole.
Second, the professor cites that according to the speed issue, Peary's journey was different than Avery's because Avery did not carry his food with his, he had lighter ship. This mean's that his speed was higher. This prove that Peary could not reach the North pole in 37 days. This challenges the text, which claims that a recent expedition provides supports for Peary's claim that he reached the North Pole.
Finally, The lecturer declares that Peary's photographs prove nothing unless the shadows in them were examined precisely, which could not be done with Peary's photographs because the shadows in the pictures are fuzzy and blurred. This refutes the reading, which asserts that there are photos taken by Peary that support his claim that he had reached the North Pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...eed issue, Pearys journey was different than Averys because Avery did not carry his ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ld not reach the North pole in 37 days. This challenges the text, which claims that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12867647059 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31606850822 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496323529412 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5647981424 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560455316371 0.272083759551 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255331731103 0.0996497079465 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128091593489 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.389406581988 0.162205337803 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328000643443 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.