tpo 29Q1
In this set materials, the reading states that there are findings which support the hypothesis of dinosaur's migration toward southern regions, and provides three reasons to support this claim. However, the professor believes that the given reasons are not convincing and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading asserts that the dinosaur's diet shows that they went to the south. On the contrary, the professor says there are 24-hour picks of sunshine during the summer, which provide a good condition for the growth of the plants. Moreover, these animals could feed dead plant during the winter.
Second, the reading declares that several skeletons of these animals have been extracted in the area. To argue with this statement, the professor says that this claim is not meaningful. According to the professor, the animals live in hers to protect themselves from predators not just for migration. She provides an example of a modern-day animal, which lives in hers, but do not migrate, to opposes this claim.
Third, the reading claims that these animals are able physically to do such migration. The professor cast doubts on this point by explaining that they do not migrate just by adult animals, and there are definitely some young children among them. So, they did not leave their children. As a result, they stayed there, even in bad weather condition, to protect their offspring.
- tpo 24 Q1 80
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing thing together that are related to schoolw 70
- tpo 44 Q2 3
- tpo 29Q1 78
- TPO 22- Q1 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...saurs migration toward southern regions, and provides three reasons to support th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, second, so, third, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14718614719 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46557984563 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4289113881 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4615384615 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181951727087 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618305739227 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452540499686 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106899340707 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209663700571 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.