TPO 32
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that some sailors in Russian submarines hear a strange sound was named quackers for 2 decades, and the reading brings several reasons for the source of quackers. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First and foremost, the reading indicates that ocra whales make the sound as the same as quackers when they want to attract female, so this sound would belong to ocra whales; in contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that ocra whales live near the surface, but submarines are in the depths. Thus, it is highly unlikely that the sound could be heard from this far distance, and she also adds that orcas could be detected by submarines' sonar.
Furthermore, the reading argues that giant squids are living in the deep ocean, and they are intelligent animals, so they may able to emit this sound; conversely, what the professor believes is different. She points out that Russian submarines hear quackers for 2 decades(19960 until 1980). But, giant squids live in the ocean for several years after 1980. Therefore, if it was their sounds, it must be heard before that period or these days too, but there is not any report of quackers recently.
Finally, according to the reading, quackers might produce with some military technology from other countries that were secretly patrolling the area. However, the professor believes that quicker move around and change direction quickly. But, at that time, countries did not have the technology for producing submarines that move fast. Also, they could not make some submarines that became silent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 440, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...so adds that orcas could be detected by submarines sonar. Furthermore, the r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20503597122 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44905918587 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1485418019 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.583333333 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393941981943 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128578137028 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693380465589 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218085358303 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059836540518 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.