TPO 33
In this set of materials the reading passage discusses that Archaeologists suggested several theories about the purpose of making and meaning of the Carved stone balls. While the in the listening the professor cast doubts on what is presented in the text and believes that Non of the three theories described ion tyhe text is not convincing.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that the stone balls used in hunting or fighting. However, the professor claims that this stone balls have not a lot of cracks and they preserve in a very well sahpe and without any damage. Therefore these stone balls could not be used for hunting.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that stone balls used as a tools for weghting and measuring system. She says that thses stone balls built from different stones For example, some from sand stones and some other from cord and etc. Thus, the balls with the same size have not similar weight. Consequentely, these stone balls could not be used for measuring.
Finally, in the text it is stated that the stone balls had been the social impact for people at this time. The professor subscribes that These balls could not had this purpose because of two reasons. The intricat patern of these balls are too simple and the second therse stone balls should be put into the graved of high rank people when they dide. Butr the Archaeologists cannot find any of these balls in the graves. Thus, these stone balls could not had a social importance for this people.
- TPO 50 3
- TPO 50 3
- TPO 39 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- People try new dangerous sports such as sky-diving or rock climbing. Should such sports be banned? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...very well sahpe and without any damage. Therefore these stone balls could not be used for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a tool' or simply 'tools'?
Suggestion: a tool; tools
...with this idea that stone balls used as a tools for weghting and measuring system. She ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...om sand stones and some other from cord and etc. Thus, the balls with the same size have...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the text it is stated that the stone balls had been the social impact for peo...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...r subscribes that These balls could not had this purpose because of two reasons. Th...
^^^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...aves. Thus, these stone balls could not had a social importance for this people.
^^^
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s could not had a social importance for this people.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75471698113 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31765093877 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501886792453 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3685138772 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468571099337 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186999457117 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668311219298 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29013984782 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985133785025 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.