tpo 33
The reading discusses several theories about intention and meaning of carved stone balls, found in Scotland, in the lives of peoples of that time. However, the lecturer finds the ideas dubious and casts that on each theory proposed by the reading passage.
First, the other argues that these carved stone balls might have been used as a means of hunting or fighting. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that these stones could not have been for these purposes since it has no cracks and the surface of that is well-preserved.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that carved stone balls might have been used for measurement. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that although these stones have the same size, they do not maintain the same weight
Finally, the reading passage asserts that these stones might have been used for social purposes. In contrast, the speaker dismisses the issue because the patterns carved on the balls were elementary. Moreover, whenever an eminent member of society died, they will be buried with their possessions. As these stones were not in their tombs, these theories will be rejected too.
- tpo 41 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 86
- tpo 37 3
- tpo 35 3
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07329842932 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41685282947 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.646761734 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400461418821 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172580934481 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977562412681 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25263278123 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751175308637 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.