TPO 34
The reading specifies that there are three theories about the main cause of the extinction of the sea cow. However, the professor explains that we cannot find out what make sea cows extinct and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the article claims that, sea cows were a good source of food for native siberian people. Consequently, they hunted many of sea cows and after many years they extinct. The professor opposes this point by saying that the sea cows were massive creature and weight ten ton and capturing couple of them could feed many people for a month. Also the population of native siberian were few and it was not vital for them to capture large number of sea cows.
Second, based on the reading, there was ecosystems disturbances which declined the main source of food of sea cows and these change help its extinction. The lecturer assert that if sever ecosystems disturbances happen and decline the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal and not just kelp and native people do not record any food shortage and it is not feasible that because of the ecological changes sea cows extinct.
Third, according to the reading, when European fur traders come to the island, they had many weapons that allow them to capture and kill sea cows and because of this sea cows extinct. The speaker contradicts the idea reasoning that the population of sea cows decreases before European fur traders come to the island. Hence, it was another main reason that trigger the reduce of sea cows population and European fur traders did not have a role diminish of sea cows population.
Therefore, the specific reasons mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | rassata | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | ellen87713 | view | |
| 2022-01-30 | omega93 | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | vida00 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country 69
- television advertising directed towards young children should not be allowed 70
- TPO12 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 76
- TPO 12 - It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hem could feed many people for a month. Also the population of native siberian were ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...hange help its extinction. The lecturer assert that if sever ecosystems disturbances h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changes'?
Suggestion: changes
...cline the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal a...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...it was another main reason that trigger the reduce of sea cows population and European fur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79661016949 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36523222333 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0124751406 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.621123484804 0.272083759551 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.259404862797 0.0996497079465 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112267108527 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315689263089 0.162205337803 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16129837667 0.0443174109184 364% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.