The reading and the lecture both discuss main reasons for extinction. The author of the reading believes that there are some theories that can illustrate the main cause of extinction and provides three reasons to support it. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes reasons in the reading by providing detailed information.
First, the author of the reading claims that the see cows might have dyed by a specific group of people. This point is challenged by the lecturer. The professor thinks that these cows are massive, so it does not makes sense that those group of people hunted that many of them. As a matter of fact, this group of Siberian people were not that many in population.
Second, the author mentions that cows lost their main source of their food, but the professor rebuts this argument. He states that this point is not true, because it should have an effect on other parts of marine, but it does not.
Finally, the reading says that European fur traders are the major cause of this issue. In the contrast, the professor refutes this reason by explaining that these European people came to that area after that time.
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
- Athletes and entertainers can be good politicians. 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: in twenty years there will be fewer cars on the road than there are today. 60
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 61
- 55) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Essay evaluation report
so it does not makes sense
so it does not make sense
flaws:
No. of Words: 197 250 //more content wanted from reason 2 and 3
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 19 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 197 250
No. of Characters: 912 1200
No. of Different Words: 107 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.746 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.629 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.17 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.485 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.374 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.636 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'make'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: make
... these cows are massive, so it does not makes sense that those group of people hunted...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
... these cows are massive, so it does not makes sense that those group of people hunted...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'as a matter of fact', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256880733945 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.142201834862 0.158904122519 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0688073394495 0.0723426182421 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0229357798165 0.0435111971325 53% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0366972477064 0.0277247811725 132% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155963302752 0.128828473217 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0229357798165 0.0370669169778 62% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.2578392614 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00917431192661 0.0208969081088 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.160550458716 0.128158765124 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0137614678899 0.0158828679856 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00917431192661 0.0114777025283 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1140.0 1645.83664459 69% => OK
No of words: 197.0 271.125827815 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78680203046 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04852973271 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314720812183 0.374372842146 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223350253807 0.287516216867 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.131979695431 0.187439937562 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0710659898477 0.113142543107 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2578392614 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 49.0315675673 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9090909091 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.756866004 49.3711431718 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.636363636 132.220823453 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.878197800319 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 40.2441162898 50.5018328374 80% => OK
Elegance: 2.15909090909 1.90840788429 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.637938643685 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.160120800344 0.142949733639 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0983511844732 0.0787303798458 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.670096944468 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.134134343578 0.139662658121 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.324908204449 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103089588875 0.103435571967 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.332250210603 0.414875509568 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0611623235059 0.0530846634433 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.456662674781 0.40443939384 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675985889465 0.0528353158467 128% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.