TPO 35 integrated writting
Both the reading and the speaker talk about the "Voynich manuscript" which became famous in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The former provides different theroies to explains that this manuscript is fake, while the lateral emphasizes that this manuscript is wrtten for different purpose.
To begin with, the author states that manuscript does not prove any scientific or any magical use. The reading states that it is a fake and its text has no real meaning. On the other hand, the speaker contradict this points. He says that Anthony Ascham, He was not original physician and his work is also not original. The speaker explains that His book a Little Herbal does contain only common herbal plant which we can find easily every where. So this argument doen't prove that Voynich manuscript was fake.
Moreover, the reading contends that Voynich manuscript is similar to Edward kellys magical book, which he did crete to extract money from the wealth noble. However, the lecturer cast doubt on this theory. He says that Voynich took efforts to creat this book, he used many real code to hide his work. The speaker also mentions that in the sixteen century was easy to make full to the people than why Voynich puts lots of efforts to do that. So the speaker is disagree that this manuscript is fake.
Furthermore, theh reading states that the manuscript is a modern fake. It is argued that Voynich was anitique book deal so he had knowledge about the old manuscript, as a result, he created fake one. Once again the speaker was not agreed. He says that with the help of ink and valem we can date when the manuscript was written and based on that they found it was 400 years old, which proves that Voynich manuscript is not fake.
- po 3 3
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintin 3
- TPO 35 integrated writting 3
- TPO 3 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...n herbal plant which we can find easily every where. So this argument doent prove that Voyn...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...f efforts to do that. So the speaker is disagree that this manuscript is fake. Furthe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ript, as a result, he created fake one. Once again the speaker was not agreed. He sa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79801324503 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41501532541 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2077511248 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2352941176 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.