tpo 35 international funds for the world's forests
The material discusses the development of international funds to protect the world's forest. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely develop international funds could protect forest-agriculture. Next, these funds could improve the economic situation of forests' dwellers. Finally, protecting forests could help to attain biodiversity.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points one specific contradiction is increase agriculture could be destructive because increase population could force farmers to increase harvests by using technology and fertilizers, which could lead to run off waste and water pollution. In addition to that, governments are the owners of forests, not residences, so this money will not end up in dwellers' hands, so it does not increase their financial situation. One final point, there is no guarantee that this money will be used to plant trees, the government could use it to plant other plants, and international monitoring is rather inadequate.
- in the past, it was easier to identify a career that leads to a secure and successful future. 76
- tpo 33 the carved stone balls 75
- tpo 35 international funds for the world's forests 76
- young people today could not participate in helping their communities as they were in the past 90
- tpo 45 bees existance 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, regarding, so, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 168.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82142857143 5.08290768461 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15500897505 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64880952381 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2306575537 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143278711744 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920387144571 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108624409323 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124785838647 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765384719822 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.2367328918 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.