TPO 35
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
The professor explains theories that have been mentioned about the origin of the Voynich manuscript certainly is not correct and provide reasons about it.
First of all, the people say the manuscript had been written by a sixteenth-century botanist, Antohny Ascham, could pay close attention that he was just an ordinary scientist. Accordint to professore he wrote in his book just about common plants based on perivous works. Therefore, this manuscirp witt difucult unkown codes could not be belong to him. In contrast, the reading Section states that Anthony Ascham could be a possible author of that manuscript.
Secondly, the professore says manuscript also could not be created by Edward Kelley who created fake magic book to get money from wealthy noble. Because people that time were not celever. Kelley could create a simple fake mangic manuscirpt with a little work. But this manuscript is certainly hard working book. In contrast the reading section claims that the finding manuscript is created by Edward Kelley who get monty by selling fake magic book to nobe people.
Finally, the professore states the antique book dealer, Wilfrid M. Voynich could not be author of this manuscript. Accoridng to professore, reaserach reavealed that both paper and ink are vere old about 16 centry. And thid book dealer could not find these old papers and inks to produce fake manuscript. In contrast, the reading says Voynich is creater of this manuscript.
- TPO41Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO41Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 4 3
- TPO 36 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e say the manuscript had been written by a sixteenth-century botanist, Antohny As...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...c book to get money from wealthy noble. Because people that time were not celever. Kell...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ript is certainly hard working book. In contrast the reading section claims that the fin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at both paper and ink are vere old about 16 centry. And thid book dealer could no...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17372881356 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60036611017 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9566708717 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7333333333 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0444556072466 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0188026187357 0.0996497079465 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022876526686 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0299822327959 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00686921433334 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.