TPO 36 integrated writing
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about whether adding the chemical silver iodide decrease the amount of damages after spaying on storm clouds or not. In the text, the author believes that there are some evidence which have shown the impact of these materials. The lecturer challenges all the arguments mentioned in the reading passage. She is of the opinion that none of this evidence is convincing.
Firstly, the author states that laboratory experiments have shown the silver prevent the formation of hail. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that although the addition of silver may prevent the formation of hail, it will adversely affect in other aspects. Furthermore, she says that these phenomena, formation of snow rather than hail, may leads to some dry seasons and lack of water in some areas. Thus, the plants will be damaged in these situations.
Moreover, the author asserts that there are some evidence in some Asian countries which support the truth of its claims. The lecturer, on the other hand, rebuts this claim and says that this evidence are not clear enough because if these phenomena had been affected in various nearby areas, it could not be very strong evidence. She believes that cloud seeding might happen in these areas as a result of natural changes. Therefore, it is not relevant to the silver addition.
Eventually, the writer holds the opinion that in some local studies such as central states of United States the value of cloud seeding was proved. The lecturer, however, dismisses it by asserting that these studies were not convincing. She mentions that these areas are much polluted and the pollution might affect these studies. It is possible that these studies are not repeatable in non-polluted area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-20 | HideAPumpkin | 75 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Mizanur | 40 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | alibenvari | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | neda77aa | view |
- TPO 55 Writing 1Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number 71
- T P O 20 - Integrated TOEFL essay , " let it burn" policy 3
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task 70
- TPO 37 Integrated writing 29
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...he formation of hail, it will adversely affect in other aspects. Furthermore, she says th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02040816327 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4362409623 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0311932643 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.25 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.