The reading states that a microscopic gungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum infects trees and causes serious damage in oak trees and provides three method of protecting the forest. The professor, however, claims that the proposed methods by the author have serious limitations and are not practical.
First, the reading states that stopping p.ramorum spores from spreading would be an effective method. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this point by saying that it does not have huge impact. For her claim, she mentions that there is another form of spreading P. ramorum such as rainfall that wash them into streams. Therefore, this form of spreading is hard to control.
Second, the reading states that there are a few fungicidal chemicals that can be used to protect the oak trees. The professor, though, contradicts this point by saying that the cemicals mentioned by article has a few impact about three months. Thus, it needs to be repeated aftar that period. She adds that these chemicals can be used just for a park. But they are not practical for thousand of thousand of forests. Morever this way would be too expensive for this extended areas.
Finally, the article claims that clear-cutting is also another way of fighting P.ramorum. The professor, again, refutes this point by providing some of disadvantages. For one, she mentions that there are some vegetations around the infected trees that need to be cutted but there are some other that are healthy. As a result, in this way, some healthy vegetations are sacrificed. Above all, there are some tree species around those infected trees that are rare, and so these rare species are destroyed. So this method is not practical.
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities. 50
- Why go to university? 66
- TPO 48- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun impact seems to be countable; consider using: 'few impacts'.
Suggestion: few impacts
...the cemicals mentioned by article has a few impact about three months. Thus, it needs to b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... a park. But they are not practical for thousand of thousand of forests. Morever this wa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'thousand of'.
Suggestion: thousand of
... a park. But they are not practical for thousand of thousand of forests. Morever this way would be too ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the disadvantages') or simply say ''some disadvantages''.
Suggestion: some of the disadvantages; some disadvantages
... again, refutes this point by providing some of disadvantages. For one, she mentions that there are s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'others'?
Suggestion: others
...at need to be cutted but there are some other that are healthy. As a result, in this ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05281690141 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57080597179 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.452052476 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.75 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.