TPO 39.
In the reading, the author claims that at the end of Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event which annihilated many species. However, finding all ideas questionable and implausible, the professor in the listening by using a number of points refutes all readings' ideas and says that none of them is not a good explanation for mass extinction.
First off, the author argues that near the end of the Triassic period sea leves were fluctuating and often gowing down which destroyed the food chains of species which lived on the coast. Conversely, the professor disputes this point by clarifiying the fact that land species had the ability to adapt themselves to changes. Moreover, this change was quite gradual and took several million years.
Secondly, the reading holds the view that at the and of Triassic period a widspread volcanic occured which spread SO2 into the atmosphere which in turn reduced the global tempratures and led to the extinction. On the contrary, the professor states that SO2 couldn't be present into the atmosphere for a long time. it eventually will combine with atmosphere's materials and come back to the earth as the rain.
Last, the author asserts that asteroid strike have blocked sunlight for a long time which caused a mass extiction as a last point for supporting that mass extinction eliminated all kind of living. In contrast, the professor, though, dismisses this issue by pointing out that asteroide strike's time come back to 12 million years before the extinction. Therefore, it would not be a good support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-15 | unknown_User | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-15 | unknown_User | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...contrary, the professor states that SO2 couldnt be present into the atmosphere for a l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uldnt be present into the atmosphere for a long time. it eventually will combine...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...t into the atmosphere for a long time. it eventually will combine with atmospher...
^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mosphere for a long time. it eventually will combine with atmospheres materials ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04597701149 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71498048578 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7322406209 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.727272727 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.