TPO 39
The author points out to some possible causes which are usually regarded as the possibilities of mass-extinction event before dinosaurs emerged. The lecturer, however, rolls out the mentioned hypothesis and offers some counterclaims to indicate that none of them is convincing.
First, according to the reading, fluctuation of sea level might have been one of the reasons since during that period, water level altered periodically. As a result, the animals extinction might led to a noticeable effect on food chain. Nonetheless, the professor refutes the claim due to the fact that it most probably happed gradually. Although it is completely true that sea level changed, often went down, in that time, it could not have great impact on the environment, on the grounds that it is merely affected when there is an abrupt change in environment.
Second, the sulfur dioxide resulted from volcanic activities can be the other possible explanation for the disappearance of numerous animals. This gas may decrease the earth's temperature, and animals became extinct. On the contrary, the professor casts doubt on the statement. He mentions the fact that such terrible gases most likely come back to the earth by rainfall. Therefore, it is implausible that the amount of SO2 were a lot which rain could not clear it out.
Third, when asteroids hit earth surface it brought about a reduce in temperature of earth, caused by the soil and crashed rock went up to the air and block the sunlight, which is considered the last probable answer for why a large proportion of creatures vanished. Conversely, the speaker rejects the claim by mentioning some other aspects of asteroid impact. As a matter of fact, this event occurred twelve million years before the extinction. Hence, there is not any connection between the extinction process and asteroids strike.
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, and students are almost never involved. Which approach do you 70
- Tpo23-people believe that it would be better to work quickly and carelessly 76
- one who cannot accept others' criticism becomes successful in group 90
- Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books. When a movie is based on a book, some people prefer to read the book before watching the movie. Other people prefer to read the book only after they have watched the movie. Which do you prefer and 90
- TPO 39 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... altered periodically. As a result, the animals extinction might led to a noticeable ef...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...rous animals. This gas may decrease the earths temperature, and animals became extinct...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...oids hit earth surface it brought about a reduce in temperature of earth, caused by the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19333333333 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85630686182 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2490925013 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.866666667 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.