tpo 40
The reading and the lecture are both about, which is about the possibility of human hospitality on the Venous in the future like Mars. The author of the reading states that the conditions of that plane make this theory impossible, and he presents three reasons to support his view. However, the lecturer casts doubt the claim in the article. He thinks that the conditions on Venous's planets are not life impossible, and scientists can overcome all of them. He explains his idea as the following.
First of all, the author claims that the environmental pressure on that planet's surface is extremely high and above the pressure of the Earth. He believes that every spacecraft destroyed before reaching the ground of the Venous, which makes the probabilities of human crashed, too. The lecturer challenges this point, he says that based on the experiment of one spacecraft station which is 50 km above that planet's atmosphere; however, it does not crash. Furthermore, he points out that the pressure on the ground and beneath that highly level pressure is normal like the earth; therefore, it would be possible to preserve lives on it.
Secondly, the author states that since there is no water or Oxygen in Venous, it is hard to import it from our planet. He argues the presence of only carbon dioxide, and sulfuric acids at that surface are not helpful for people's reservoir. Whereas The lecturer rebuts this argument he believes scientists are now capable of producing the Oxygen from a natural, ordinary chemical reaction between carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. He suggests that it is not necessary to transfer that gas from the Earth. He elaborates this by mentioning that this chemical reaction is very easy to prepare in Venous's environment.
Finally, the author suggests that the clouds above Venous's climate reflect most of the sunlight. He is of the opinion that without the presence of the sunlight there, it is no life and no way to produce life there under any circumstances The lecturer, on the other hand, states that it is right those clouds are very thick and blocking most of the sunlight, but still our scientists can use sunlight collection from a station above those clouds and He puts forth the idea that collected light would be then reflected back to the surface with the help of the lower atmospheric layer.
In conclusion, the lecturer casts doubt on all the claims of the passage.
- tpo 40 73
- tpo 46 70
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 61
- tpo 46 68
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...craft station which is 50 km above that planets atmosphere; however, it does not crash....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 22.412803532 228% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 30.3222958057 195% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 408.0 270.72406181 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92647058824 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58047615186 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482843137255 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 419.366225166 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 3.25607064018 399% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.3604707264 49.2860985944 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.235294118 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231701594814 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698794708524 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459833556823 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114271070552 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655729267041 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.