TPO 40
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that human may not present on Mars, because it has a harsh and inhospitable condition. On the other hand, The listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First, the reading passage indicates that pressure surface of Venus is at least 90 times greater than pressure surface of Earth, so spacecraft and humans have been crashed; in contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that by establishing floating station above Venus surface, the most problem may solve. This station must build about 50km above the Venus surface. So, in the floating station atmospheric pressure on Venus' surface much lower than the surface of it, and it is equal to the earth. As a result, atmospheric pressure on Venus' surface does not dangerous for human and spacecraft.
Furthermore, the reading argues that Venus does not have reservoirs of water and oxygen, also, by compounds of the Venus, people cannot produce water; conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. He points out that compounds of Venus are carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. People can make water and oxygen by some chemical process on the compounds. So, it is not needed to transfer water and oxygen to Venus.
Finally, according to the reading, Venus' surface has think cloud which prevents the sunlight to reach the Venus' surface, so people can not make electricity by solar power. However, the professor believes that on the station, the cloud not think as the surface of Venus. Also, the clouds can reflect the sunlight, and the sunlight is able to reach the station. As a result, people can use both reflect sunlight and direct sunlight to produce electricity. Furthermore, they can produce electricity more than they use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 54, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...rding to the reading, Venus surface has think cloud which prevents the sunlight to re...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, at least, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21016949153 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58398488384 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501694915254 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6117774038 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.466666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406155691573 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142477273381 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804758497604 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215361704244 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101557831795 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.