The reading and the lecture discuss the possibility to make Venus a hospitable place for humanity. The author believes that the extreme conditions of Venus will not keep human lives. The professor brings into question the claims made in the article. He considers that despite being challenging to accommodate people in this place, this is possible.
First, the author comes up with the idea that the atmospheric pressure makes this planet really difficult to land on with a pressure 90 times greater than the earth’s. However, the lecturer argues that there is a possibility to have a floating station 50km above the surface which will equal the earth’s atmospheric pressure, solving the problem to crash with the surface.
Second, the author states that as in Venus there are some chemical gases such as CO2 or H2S3 which contain little amounts of oxygen or water vapor –indispensable to live. So, humans would need to import oxygen and water from the earth which would make it even more difficult to live there. Meanwhile, the professor rebuts this argument pointing out that a possible solution would be to create chemical oxygen and water vapor since the existing chemicals in Venus, therefore, he believes that we would not need to import those necessarily.
Third, the author contends that less than 40 percent of sunlight reaches the surface of Venus because it is greatly reflected in the space and blocked by a Co2 layer. Then, without sunlight, it would not be impossible to generate electricity by solar energy. The professor, on the other hand, posits that as the station would 50km above, there would be less blocking clouds and a thinner Co2 layer, as a result of this, the upcoming sunlight will be enough to generate power to the station.
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 76
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 85
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 80
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ons of Venus will not keep human lives. The professor brings into question the clai...
^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accommodating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accommodating
...onsiders that despite being challenging to accommodate people in this place, this is possible....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, second, so, then, therefore, third, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02711864407 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60239652661 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2565045656 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416871155686 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137107358609 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621490629927 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215754130196 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618585486726 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.