The passage and lecture are arguing over the question whether new strict rules should be established for coal ash. The passage author lists out some reasons that new strict rules are unnecessary. In contrast, the lecturer questions this view.
First, based on the passage, the companies use liner for new ponds or landfills. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that liners are just used for new ponds and landfills. In this respect, in the old ponds and landfills the coal ash can leaks to ground and contaminate the ground water. Therefore, there is no doubt that the new strict rules are required for using line not only in new ponds but also in old ones.
Second, the passage states that these coal ashes are recycled and people might be afraid for using these recycled materials by creating new strict regulation. However, the lecturer refuses this reason and she states mercury consumption as an example. She mentions that there were some strict regulations for mercury usage, but people would not be afraid and use this element.
Second, the passage author mentions that the new strict rules cause that people do not use the recycled material which are made of coal ash. The lecturer, however, refuses this argument and she states mercury as a dangerous material. She points out that the mercury has a strict rule for handling for long time, 50 years while people use these materials easily and without any concerns. Hence, strict rules are unlikely to change people decision for using the recycled materials from coal ash.
Third, the author believes that the new strict rules will increase the power companies cost, as a result, these companies will increase the price of electricity. Nevertheless, the lecturer challenges it and she states that, although the new rules will impose a 15 billion dollars extra cost to companies, companies are able to compensate this cost by increasing one percent the house electricity price. In result, the people should pay a small cost for conserving environment.
All in all, the passage mentions three reasons to assert that present regulations are sufficient. The lecturer holds opposite side and refuses these reasons.
All in all, the passage mentions some critics for establishing new strict rules for handling and storing coal ash. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubts these reasons.
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wai 70
- TPO 39 - integrated writing 3
- TPO 31 Integrated Writing Task 42
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree:When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 81
- The world’s forests 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...he passage and lecture are arguing over the question whether new strict rules should be established ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'leak'
Suggestion: leak
...ld ponds and landfills the coal ash can leaks to ground and contaminate the ground wa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, while, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1373.03311258 144% => OK
No of words: 386.0 270.72406181 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11398963731 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45316953201 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448186528497 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 419.366225166 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1927074554 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416279922199 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138662436691 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999282502114 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215129619491 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834403531425 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.