TPO 41
The reading discusses, some environmentalists believed that the government should take serious decisions for managing and storing coal ash. In opposite, representatives of the power company have a different view and debate that the new regulations are not necessary. The author listed three factors to support the latter view. However, the speaker finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the power company claims that effective regulations are. for instance, every regulation must use specific material to prevent contaminations so, must use liner in every landfill. In contrast, the speaker asserts that using the liner is not a sufficient way. in other words, the liner must be used when we have new landfills or ponds. also, several of these disposals have caused damage to the groundwater and contaminate drink water. Hence, she refutes this reason.
Second, the author mentions that some statistics show making strict roles may discourage people to buy recycling materials and consider them dangerous. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and by standing that it is not caused the consumers to stop using ash constructs. like mercury which has fairly material that recycled safely.
Finally, the reading passage argues that new strict rules will increase the price of electricity. On the other hand, the speaker states that it is true that it needs 15 billion dollars price but it only increases 1% of the expense of every family bills and it is trivial. Therefore, the speaker rebuts this reason too.
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively they are asked to work alone on projects. 76
- TPO 22 integrated writing 75
- TPO 37 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... claims that effective regulations are. for instance, every regulation must use spe...
^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...sing the liner is not a sufficient way. in other words, the liner must be used whe...
^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ed when we have new landfills or ponds. also, several of these disposals have caused...
^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: BUY_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by'?
Suggestion: by
...g strict roles may discourage people to buy recycling materials and consider them d...
^^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Like
...consumers to stop using ash constructs. like mercury which has fairly material that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, in other words, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25196850394 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69124366894 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629921259843 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6687455688 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.375 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333282889884 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086942383604 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664252109866 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169317987815 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570900486295 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.