The reading specifies that there are three main reasons supporting the idea that the new regulations for handling and storing coal ash are not needed. However, the lecture casts doubt on this claim and brings up three reasons to reject specific points made in the reading passage.
First, the author asserts that enough regulations already exist related to handling and storing coal ash. On the other hand, the lecture states that the regulations that we have now are not sufficient. In fact, existed regulations are only applied to new companies, and it does not include old companies.
Second, based on the reading, new striker rules may cause consumers to stop buying the products. In contrast, the lecture contradicts this claim, reasoning that we should consider how people responded to other restrictions. For example, there are very strict regulations related to Mercury restoration, but people recycle Mercury for over 40 years, so it is unlikely that consumers stop recycling coal ash.
Third, the reading's last point state that creating new regulations can increase costs. Nonetheless, the professor challenges this claim by explaining that the costs will increase, but these costs increase the bill only one percent that is not a big price to pay for having a clean environment.
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 81
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Nowadays many movies or films are based on books Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book Which one do you prefer 79
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...s that the regulations that we have now are not sufficient. In fact, existed regula...
^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to pay for having a clean environment.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, third, for example, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25480769231 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65453847575 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600961538462 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1708003584 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353862163063 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135342058263 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102928383558 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203993025075 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443919804837 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.