The reading and lecture both discuss the effect of the new regulations of handling and storing the coal ash. While the reading provides three claims to disagree with these regulations, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the article avers that the companies will have a concern about using very special liner to prevent the leaking into the ground. This is because they have to use these liner with every new landfill and every new pond. However, the professor argues this notion by saying that the government should make very strong regulation for the coal companies because the rules that we have is not sufficient. In addition, these companies use liner just at new landfill or with new pond only. So, many chemicals cause leaking and these materials can go through underground and contaminate the drinking water. As a result, we need very hard regulations to prevent these drawbacks.
In addition, the article mentions that some companies will stop buy these disposable products. This is because they will be afraid from these harmful materials. So, many coal's companies will be affected. On the other hand, the professor question this idea by pointing out that this concern will not stop consumers to buy these materials. For example, many companies still buy mercury over many years and they knew that mercury is very restricted product.
Finally, the reading mentions that the price of electricity will increased because the coal companies have concern about the cost of handling these materials. Nevertheless, the professor rejects this idea by explaining that this extra cost will be worth it. This is because the cost of electricity is like fifty billion dollars and the electricity pill will increased just one percent. So, it will be not too much to protect the environment.
- The lecture and the passage discuss about the limitation of archarology science. Although the passage claims that the archaeology science has been limited by few financial supporting, job positioning and new foundations to dig, The speaker refutes this id 3
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 75
- TPO 40 Integrated Writing Task 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this liner' or 'these liners'?
Suggestion: this liner; these liners
...round. This is because they have to use these liner with every new landfill and every new p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ions that the price of electricity will increased because the coal companies have concern...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 359, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...n dollars and the electricity pill will increased just one percent. So, it will be not to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13043478261 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56669298649 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484949832776 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2701322213 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2352941176 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29180241679 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108020724983 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777157248894 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175802691158 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498130715845 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.