TPO 42
The main idea of both the lecture and the passage is that some wild birds are injured in the urban cites because of colliding with glasses of buildings. Considering this, the author offers three solutions to deal with the problem. The professor, on the other hand, unequivocally challenges whatever contended in the passage by posing some problems.
First, both the professor and the author talk about one-way glasses. As claimed by the passage, if one-way glasses are used in the construction of buildings, the windows of buildings seem like barriers. As a result, birds change their directions because birds are not able to see behind the buildings. The lecturer, nevertheless, contradicts the author's view and explains that outside the buildings, one-way glasses reflect the light and work like mirrors, for example, the reflection of the sky is the sky. As a result, birds are not capable of distinguishing reflected light and fly through the buildings which may cause some injuries.
Second of all, both the lecture and passage discuss a colorful design on the glasses of buildings. The passage goes on to mention that colorful design on the glasses of windows may be another possible solution that avoids birds flying through buildings. In contrast, the lecturer explains that in these colorful designs, there are some windows through which people can see outsides. birds try to fly toward these opening parts on the buildings. Therefore, the size of openings should reduce in order to prevent birds to do so. but It doesn’t a suitable solution because inside the buildings becomes dark.
The last point discusses in the passage is that an artificial magnetic field is used in the building in order that birds change their directions to fly along with the earth’s magnetic field. However, the professor rejects this by declaring that birds can navigate by using earth magnetic field, but birds use this ability for long distances travel, for example, during their migration from cooler country to warmer one in winter. They use their eye for traveling from one side of the city to the other side. so that using an artificial magnetic field doesn’t seem a good solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
- TPO 43 80
- TPO 40 68
- Some people believe that discussion-based classes are better for students.Others think that lecture-based classes are more effective. Which ONE do you think is better for students? 70
- Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 70
- TPO 44 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e passage by posing some problems. First, both the professor and the author...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngs which may cause some injuries. Second of all, both the lecture and pass...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 401, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Birds
...through which people can see outsides. birds try to fly toward these opening parts o...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 514, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...one side of the city to the other side. so that using an artificial magnetic field...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 30.3222958057 188% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14484679666 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65089460082 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493036211699 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9646788822 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.611111111 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475729331805 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14115569482 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804824872688 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265374208558 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884355145556 0.0443174109184 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.