The main idea of both the reading passage and the lecture is about some solutions to reduce the possibility of flying birds through the glass. On the other hand, the professor rejects what ever mentioned in the passage.
First, the reading passage discusses that we can replace the regular glass with one-way glass. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point and states that one-way glass works as a mirror and birds do not distinguish the mirror. Thus, one-way glass is as ineffective as regular glass. Moreover, if birds see a reflection of sky or tree in a mirror, they will try to fly through it.
Second, the reading passage discusses that that we can use paint colorful lines on regular glass and we can see through the openings in them. On the other hand, the professor rejects this point and states that birds see the openings as holes and try to fly through them. Unless, the openings do design extremely small which in such case the room will be so dark.
Eventually, the reading passage discusses that we can create an artificial magnetic field to guide birds because they can sense magnetic fields. But, the professor is against this point and states that birds use this ability during traveling long distances and they do not use this ability for travel from a side of city to another. The professor adds that, in the case of short distances, they use their eyes and brightening of light for navigation.
All in all, the reading passage provides three solutions to prevent injuries to birds while they fly. on the other hand, the professor thinks that none of these is reasonable.
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 70
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 71
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 61
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 70
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... Second, the reading passage discusses that that we can use paint colorful lines on regu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s as holes and try to fly through them. Unless, the openings do design extremely small...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...event injuries to birds while they fly. on the other hand, the professor thinks th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8115942029 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41678345328 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474637681159 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2237535364 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8571428571 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45356594291 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15955717755 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886407621906 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241752207278 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988344442952 0.0443174109184 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.