TPO 43 integrated writing
The reading discusses some theories about what agnostids ate or how they behaved and listed three factors to explain this idea. However, the speaker finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute them.
First, the author proposes that it is plausible that they were free-swimming predators which preyed on other small animals. In contrast, the speaker asserts that swimming in the ocean and praying needed the development eye to improve their vision, while they have poor vision or in other words, they were blind, and could not chase after pray and must have other sense that there is not any evidence. Therefore, the speaker dismisses this theory.
Second, the author mentioned that they were seafloor residents that feed on the dead organisms. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and states that they have the ability to be fast so they could not occupy the small geographic areas.
Last but not least, the reading passage points out that they were parasites which live and feed on other larger organism. On the contrary, the speaker rebuts this idea and declares that if some organisms want to be parasites they must have few populations because if not they kill the host organism. Hence, as their populations have great size, they could not be parasites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, in contrast, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96803652968 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28038193772 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566210045662 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2385499502 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06452816374 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298835719325 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116587497887 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507263714556 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174517214241 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206525359438 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.