TPO 44

Essay topics:

TPO 44

In this set of materials the reading passage discusses that the coins that found in the North America not actually related to the Europian people but it was place with someone to confusinig and misleding archelogist. While the professor in the listening casts doubts on what is presented in the text and believes that a lot of archologist beliefs that this evidence is not fake and there is a evidence that substantated relationship of this coins with Europien people.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that the coin was found in the place that very far from other site that documented that Norse people presented. However, the professor claims that it is completely possible that ppeople travel great distence for trade and cameback and this people had this ability to done this travel.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that because of no other coin have not been found in the Canadian sites so it is shows that this coin is not good evidence. She says that it is not neccesary to pac up and placed it in the canadian sitte. It is possible that they pike up it and after that cameback it by themselves.
Finally, yet importantly, in the text it is stated that the native American people did not used from the Europin coins so presence of silver coin in this area is incridible. The professor subscribes that it is possible that this coins had have another used for this native people for example it was attractive for them because of stuning and beuty and the Norse people used it because of its beuty for trade with native people.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-17 sh 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user sh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... this evidence is not fake and there is a evidence that substantated relationship...
^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...dence that substantated relationship of this coins with Europien people. First of a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eat distence for trade and cameback and this people had this ability to done this tr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...that the native American people did not used from the Europin coins so presence of s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...that it is possible that this coins had have another used for this native people for...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, so, while, for example, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6654676259 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47018607882 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453237410072 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9508028756 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.111111111 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8888888889 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363693815935 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153091171171 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108914646631 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223661929197 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023714818864 0.0443174109184 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.